Democracia
PDF

Keywords

deliberation
Democracy
participation
polyarchy
theory of justice

How to Cite

de Medeiros, I. (2019). Democracia. Political Observer | Revista Portuguesa De Ciência Política, (9), 31-43. https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2018.9/pp.31-43

Abstract

Understanding the concept of democracy in its totality today is a rather complex task, given the dimensions and variation of political societies. Revisiting the theoretical thinking of the ancients may be an interesting exercise for comparative examination of what and how Aristotelian thought is present in the modern conception of democracy. The result of this comparative exercise points to the existence of a strong analogy between the old and modern conception of democracy as a mode of government for a political society.

https://doi.org/10.33167/2184-2078.RPCP2018.9/pp.31-43
PDF

References

Aristóteles. (1985). A Política (M. Kury, Trans.). Brasília, Brasil: UnB.

Cohen, J. (1989). Deliberation and democratic legitimacy. In Harmlin A. & Petit P. (Eds.), The good polity. Oxford, United Kingdom: Blackwell.

Dahl, R. (2012). Poliarquia: participação e oposição (1st ed.) (C. Paciornik, Trans.). São Paulo, Brasil: EDUSP.

Gutmann, A. (1995). A desarmonia da Democracia. Lua Nova, 36, 5-37.

Habermas, J. (1997). Direito e democracia: entre facticidade e validade (F. Siebeneichler, Trans.). Rio de Janeiro, Brasil: Tempo Brasileiro.

Mill, J. S. (1981). Considerações sobre o governo representativo (M. Santos Jr., Trans.). Brasília, Brasil: UnB.

Pateman, C. (1992). Participação e teoria democrática (L. Rouanet, Trans.). São Paulo, Brasil: Paz e Terra.

Rawls, J. (2000). Uma teoria da justiça (1st ed.) (A. Pisetta & L. Esteves, Trans.). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes

Rousseau, J. J. (2002). Do contrato social (R. Roque da Silva, Trans.). Brasil: Ridendo Castigat Mores. Disponível em <http://www.ebooksbrasil.org/eLibris/contratosocial.html>.

Sani, G. (1998). Participação política. In Bobbio, N., Matteucci, N. & Pasquino, G. (Eds.), Dicionário de política (1st ed.) (pp. 888-890). Brasília, Brasil: UnB.

Sartori, G. (1994). A teoria da democracia revisitada (1st ed.) (A. Candido, Trans.). São Paulo, Brasil: Editora Ática.

Sen, A. (2009). A ideia de justiça. (N. Bastos, Trans.). Coimbra, Portugal: Almedina S.A.

Tocqueville, A. (2005). A democracia na América (2nd ed.). São Paulo, Brasil: Martins Fontes.

At the moment of the article submission, it is required to the author(s) declare to agree with the conditions and norms of Political Observer - Revista Potuguesa de Ciência Política, as well as guaranteeing the inedited and original character of the text submitted to scientific evolution. Thus, the author(s) declare to accept the instructions and conditions of publication of the journal, sharing with this the author’s rights, respecting the duties of copyright and ceding to the journal the rights over the first publication of the text in its printed and digital version.

The partial or integral publication and sharing of the text (in institutional repositories, book chapters, periodical publications, social media and professional platforms in the areas of science and research, among others) determines the quotation of the initial publication in the journal and the hyperlinking to the website of Political Observer - Revista Potuguesa de Ciência Política, resorting, to that effect, to the available information in the DOI (Digital Object Identifier) system.

Political Observer incentives the sharing and distribution of the work published by the authors in the journal, raising the impact factors and the number of registered quotes, this way contributing to an open (https://www.ciencia-aberta.pt/) and accessible science (http://www.unesco.org/new/en/communication-and-information/portals-and-platforms/goap/open-science-movement/).